I'm having a hard time deciding where I am on Sit/Lie. On one hand, yes, it makes sense. Clogging the sidewalks and walkways making it difficult for people to move freely about the City is wrong. Loitering can be intimidating to residents and visitors and can often lead to violence or other uncouth activities that have no business taking place in public (although in SF, really what does uncouth even mean?). But on the other hand, Sit/Lie just seems so antithetical to the spirit and nature of San Francisco. The indelible images of SF in the 60s, with people gathered to protest or socialize or sing songs is such an integral part of the history and make up of SF that it seems wrong to eliminate that kind of freedom. We are an inclusive city, unlike any other and things that happen in other places that are frowned upon, simply aren't here.